That was 50 years ago? You must be kidding…

Goldsmiths College, as it was then called

Goldsmiths College, as it then was

SOME anniversaries bring you up short. That can’t be right, you think. Looking back to 1975 is like that for me.

Once on a distant day a car drove from Cheadle Hulme to Lewisham in South East London. That car contained a young man about to turn 19, his parents and, if flickering memory holds true, one grandmother.

My luggage included a classical guitar, new pots and pans, and a small stainless steel teapot bought for me by the accompanying grandmother; that teapot always did spill but was treasured for years. More treasured was the guitar. The neck broke a long time later in a house in York I never knew I’d live in, with a woman I’d yet to meet, alongside three children who were but specks on the horizon.

As to the delights of having a granddaughter, oh, look I’m an insecure young man who walks around with the Times Literary Supplement sticking out of his pocket, on full show, so don’t expect me to think that far ahead. I have important posing duties to perform, beer to drink, friends to make, my virginity to lose.

The car went up the road to turn round, and by the time my family returned to say goodbye I’d hurried inside to see what this new life held. A lapse my mother was to mention more than once. Some lessons take a while to learn. Many years later, having dropped our eldest off at university, my wife and I drove to a grotty service station where we snivelled over cups of bad coffee, before continuing our journey home.

Yes, by some quirk of time, by a tear in the space-time continuum, it is 50 years since I went to university. In those days you couldn’t look up space-time continuum on Google to check its meaning. It was before computers, long before smart phones too, and a coin-box phone with a queue was your only link to home.

Again using what is available now but wasn’t then, I can see that Margaret Thatcher was elected leader of the Conservative Party in 1975; the Vietnam War ended; the first oil was pumped from the North Sea. Fawlty Towers and The Good Life were on the BBC. And…

Oh, you know, this doesn’t really help. Better perhaps to summon up the past as it seems from this distance. I did not keep a diary, so there is no record of the daily scratch and tick, just the swirls.

I’d rarely been to London before going there as a student. There was a school trip when we were advised not to stand too close to cars in case they blew up (true story, or so my memory insists).

For three years I studied English Literature at Goldsmiths College in New Cross, an institution now known as Goldsmiths, University of London. It’s fair to say those years shaped me or misshaped me or something. My newspaper life included ten years on the South East London Mercury, long since deceased, just round the corner from Goldsmiths.

A lifelong love of reading was cemented at that time, and I ended up working with words, wrote a few novels, and have never stopped pushing one word up against another to see what sound or shape is made.

Music was important then, a signifier, something to hide behind or argue about. Google tells me that Peter Gabriel left Genesis in 1975. In that student hall I used to be rude about Genesis, never having been a fan unlike so many others there. This was perhaps a bit of a nerve from a lover of the Grateful Dead, but in mitigation I would plead Elvis Costello, Joan Armatrading, Van Morrison, Ry Cooder and others.

Danny Thompson

Danny Thompson

Solid Air by John Martyn remains my favourite album, released two years earlier. By a quirk of timing, the brilliant double bass player Danny Thompson, who features on the album, has just died, aged 86.

According to his obit in the Guardian, Thompson, who was a member of the folk band Pentangle, formed with Martyn what the writer Mark Cooper called “a notorious double act as they slurred their way between sentimental tenderness and barely camouflaged rage”.

The hall where we lived, watched occasional episodes of Doctor Who, and listened to Henry play the piano was formed from three or four terraced houses. It’s not there now, although a small unfurnished one-bedroom flat in that road can be had for £1,650 a month, according to a local estate agent.

We used to trek up the hill to the heath, walk to Greenwich and a favourite pub. Or go past Greenwich Theatre, where I ended up reviewing plays in my Mercury days.

Many friends were made at that hall and at the university. Mostly they drifted to wherever it was we all ended up. Some died too young, including my great pal John. I speak to one cherished friend every Christmas, another lives in the US but we met in a pub in York a while back, another is in contact occasionally on Facebook.

It is a cliché of the interviewer’s art to ask someone what they would tell their younger self. Kirsty Young has even spun a BBC radio series from that query.

If I play that trick on myself, I’d answer – oh, don’t worry there are plenty of other people to be critics on the Guardian or to write the television column in the Observer. Others will write those great novels. You’ll still fill most days with what you want to do. You will fail sometimes and succeed at others; you will be great, you will be OK, you will be mediocre, you will be who you are and not who you thought you wanted to be. You’ll be a husband, father, grandfather.

Yes, you – you with the Jimi Hendrix hair and a copy of the TLS sticking out of your jacket pocket for everyone to see.

It is strange how clearly you remember what happened 50 years ago, unless, of course, I have the details wrong. Perhaps someone from the dim distance will point out any errors.

 

j j j

A few thoughts on Musk, Charlie Kirk and why I finally quit X…

King Charles while listening to Donald Trump

I have finally deactivated my X account. This was the day after Elon Musk attempted to deactivate our democracy. Musk’s sin was greater than mine but having an X account still felt unclean.

I should have gone long ago. The app was removed from my iPhone a while back but left on my laptop where it languished mostly unseen, aside from guilty peeks.

Twitter was quite good when I joined. Then Musk bought it, changed the name and started using his immense wealth to further far-right causes, stirring up hatred and rancour.

Last weekend, Musk beamed into Tommy Robinson’s far right march in London (and, yes, it was far right – calling it anything else is to normalise hatred).

Appearing on screen rather than in person, Musk called for a “dissolution of parliament” and a “change of government”. He said other inflammatory things I do not wish to repeat, ending with: “Whether you choose violence or not, violence is coming to you. You either fight back or you die, that’s the truth, I think.”

Whatever you think of Sir Keir Starmer, the tech billionaire should pipe down. It’s just not his concern.

Why should we have to put up with Musk, an awful man of fathomless wealth and scant scruple? The tech billionaire briefly went on a blind date with Nigel Farage, only to declare him not extreme enough. He turned his affections towards Robinson, a convicted criminal who is really called Stephen Christopher Yaxley-Lennon.

The only benefit in all this lay in seeing the hubristic smirk wiped off Farage’s face.

Our politics seem to be becoming increasingly American these days, partisan, shouty and belligerent. I used to be such a fan of American cultural imports, of the literature (Saul Bellow was a great favourite, F Scott Fitzgerald too), the TV shows (The Wire, The Sopranos, Six Feet Under, ER), and the films (anything good by the Coen Brothers…). But I could do without the politics.

Musk is behind attempts to turn conservative activist Charlie Kirk into a Christian nationalist martyr, urging his millions of followers to “fight or die” (his script is consistent, if nothing else).

Like many Brits, I knew nothing about Kirk until he was shot. After his assassination I discovered all sorts of stuff I wish I’d never known. His views were vile, racist, homophobic, gun crazy and designed to stir up hatred among the young.

President Trump, who considered Kirk a key ally, immediately blamed the ‘radical left’ for the shooting, despite having zero evidence. Yet another reminder that US presidents once at least attempted to bring the country together: now it’s hate first and think later, or not at all.

In the US right now it is almost a crime to say anything critical about Kirk, or just to appear insufficiently mournful about his death. Even quoting from the horrid list of things he used to say is treasonous and an invitation to be sacked.

Just ask former Washington Post columnist Karen Attiah, who says she was let go for, as she put it, “speaking out against political violence, racial double standards, and America’s apathy toward guns”.

Now I encounter a difficulty at this point. I have never read anything by Attiah and know little about her. Much as I have rarely watched the US TV host and comedian Jimmy Kimmell, who has just been suspended from his late-night show for criticising Trump.

Someone who does know about all this is President Obama, as quoted here:

“After years of complaining about cancel culture, the current administration has taken it to a new and dangerous level by routinely threatening regulatory action against media companies unless they muzzle or fire reporters and commentators it doesn’t like. This is precisely the kind of government coercion that the First Amendment was designed to prevent – and media companies need to start standing up rather than capitulating to it.”

And what Totalitarian Trumpington doing while all this was going on? He was being feted by our royal family and prime minister on a state visit, that’s what. A curious occasion and quite low-key for such glistered gladhanding, with the Trumps kept away from political settings, London and from any likelihood of protest.

Mind you, the Led By Donkey guys did manage to project images of Trump alongside Jeffrey Epstein on to Windsor Castle on Tuesday. For which stunt they were arrested. “Orwellian” and “ridiculous”, said the group, and they’re not wrong.

I cannot see why this visit went ahead, what we gained from giving the spare room to such a troublesome guest, and why we had to endure the usual stale Trumpian lectures, as parroted in this Daily Mail headline.

Still it was a minor treat to witness King Charles frowning and trying not to giggle as Trump read this encomium from his speech: “He’s given his whole heart and everything he’s got to the parts of Britain that are beyond the realm of mere legislation.”

The King looked as puzzled as the rest of us.

Trump, being Trump, couldn’t resist the usual childish prattle, saying: “We had a very sick country one year ago and today, I believe we’re the hottest country anywhere in the world, in fact nobody is even questioning that.”

That’ll be down to that global warming you insist doesn’t exist.

Here, to end, is a cartoon by Jack Ohman as borrowed from Daily Kos on Threads.

j j j

The BBC gets back about my complaint… sad to see Rayner go… some caffeinated claptrap about coffee…

As mentioned here last time, I complained to the BBC about “the endless slavish and unquestioning coverage” given to Nigel Farage and Reform UK.

Now the BBC has got back to me. Or, rather, to myself and every other similarly displeased person. To us all has been sent a dollop of corporate dung-speak from which there rises an unpleasant smell. I have attached the reply to the end of my last blog.

Short version (with a slick of added cynicism): we are right, you are wrong, and while we’re happy to hear what you have to stay, you’re still wrong and we all love Nigel round here.

Two points the BBC makes seem worth raising here.

First point. The BBC says the coverage is right because Reform UK has been “making the political weather”.

Well, it’s making the political weather because you keep puffing a gale up its sorry arse. Many elements contribute to the political weather, but the BBC endlessly banging on about one party above all others must be the biggest factor.

Also, ‘political weather’ is just lazy shorthand for Nigel Farage making a lot of noise and the BBC reporting every belligerent bellow, usually without accompanying analysis into the aforementioned noise.

Second point: “We give careful consideration to ensuring any story concerning Mr Farage and Reform UK are given proportionate and appropriate coverage on our networks and online.”

And yet other parties hardly get a look in. Oh, apart from the Labour government, which frequently is given a kicking by the weaselly Chris Mason, political editor (apparently).

The BBC has traditionally been considered left-wing by those on the right, and right-wing by those on the left. Sadly, as the corporation now appears to be run by right-wingers that argument has surely been settled.

But whatever view you take, it would be healthier if politicians of all persuasions had no influence on the BBC. For self-serving reasons, Boris Johnson felt the BBC was too left-wing, so he ‘fixed’ that – in part creating the one-sided BBC we now have.

As most media in this country is right-wing, the BBC should be neutral to balance the scales, rather than acting like a second cousin to the Daily Telegraph.

Incidentally, the BBC seemed less keen on reporting how Nigel Farage was taken down a peg or two in the US where he’d gone to plead for help with “the really awful authoritarian situation the UK has sunk into” on free speech. For his troubles he was called a ‘Putin-loving free speech impostor’ during a congressional hearing.

Breaking off for a moment to bang my head on the nearest brick wall (ouch!), that’ll be the US as run by a dictatorial president (“Maybe people like dictators”) who wants to control the universities, the media, the museums, history, the arts, who sends troops into Democrat-run cities to ‘solve’ crime problems that don’t exist, who has masked thugs arresting people on the street, and bundling them away.

Yeah, sure, but we’re the ones with an “authoritarian situation”.

Farage took time off from Parliament to badmouth Britain in this way. He’s the strangest patriot you ever did meet, but then his only true loyalty is to himself.

Oh, and this country is so authoritarian that an opposition politician can be paid a fortune to appear on a TV station where he is free to spout whatever rubbish he likes (with a favourable tax arrangement, too, reportedly).

Ouch! I’ve just banged my head again.

 

I WAS sorry to see the resignation of Angela Rayner, mainly because, whether you like her or not, she is an authentic Labour politician with a true story to tell.

The Guardian editorial on her departure contains the curious observation that: “If a minister takes the hit early and with contrition, they may be able to rebuild their career once public anger cools”.

Well, maybe – but the embers of that ‘public anger’ were mostly blown on by the Daily Telegraph, which incidentally now calls Nigel Farage “Britain’s next prime minister” at every mention.

Sadly, the posh boy element of the media hate what Rayner represents as a working-class woman who rose from a tough background in Stockport to become deputy prime minister. She had been held to standards that never attached to Tory ministers of recent times, as shown in this reminder here.

Image taken from Threads/Instagram

But I don’t understand why she didn’t seek official advice on whether she needed to pay more stamp duty. Worth adding, though, that her personal situation is quite complicated thanks to a previous family home being made into a trust for her disabled son. And that flat she bought in Hove is said to be the only property she owns.

 

IT MUST be time for a coffee after all that. Although not from Costa, as buckets of vaguely coffee-tainted milkshake are not to my taste. Something stronger, please.

According to a report in the Observer last weekend, Costa Coffee is underperforming against the artisan coffee shops popping up all over the place.

I always favour local coffee shops over the big brands, especially as in York there are so many good ones to choose from.

Anyway, Costa is owned by Coca-Cola, which shelled out £3.9bn for the dubious privilege in 2018. According to that Observer story, the company’s chief executive reportedly told analysts that Costa “had not quite delivered” and was “not where we wanted it to be from an investment hypothesis point of view”.

I have read that statement more than once and can find no possible meaning, even after an extra coffee.

Incidentally, should you spurn Costa in favour of Starbucks, it’s worth knowing that CEO Brian Niccol made “6,666 times more than the company’s median employee in 2024”. The figure is as quoted by Professor Robert Reich at Berkeley.

That’s Starbucks crossed off the list, too.

 

j j j